Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a really good question and hopefully a good solution can be implemented. I always thought namecoin was onto something because whoever was willing to spend the most (run the most miners) got to control transactions, so market forces prevented excessive squatting.

Of course that has the downside that large entities grab all the good names and the little people are left with the leftovers.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: