Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Git itself is already distributed. Do we really need more distribution or do we simply need to learn to work more distributed?


It's clear, though, that there are aspects of 'distributed' that Git does not accomplish. This gives you a global namespace and a global identity, just like a website, without a single point of failure or a corporate interest, and with a closed source system and a trivial option for forking the whole structure into your own [friend group|company|private cluster|etc].

An argument could be made that git ought to be augmented with something like this: why run distributed protocol A on distributed protocol B; maybe we should just run distributed protocol AB from the get-go?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: