> Unfairness breeds unfairness, and hyped up Bitcoin IPOs are the natural result
So because someone can't manage to get paid to do $arbitrary_thing and get their choice of $arbitrary_payment it's okay for them do do things that violate the normal bounds of good and honest conduct and run some sketchy investment scheme?
I don't buy it. If you need to get paid and can't get paid to do what you want to do, perhaps you should consider doing something else? We don't all get what we want at all times.
> compared to early adopters of Bitcoin
Vitalik was involved in Bitcoin as early as just about anyone else. His bitcointalk account predates mine— for example.
So because someone can't manage to get paid to do $arbitrary_thing and get their choice of $arbitrary_payment it's okay for them do do things that violate the normal bounds of good and honest conduct and run some sketchy investment scheme?
I don't buy it. If you need to get paid and can't get paid to do what you want to do, perhaps you should consider doing something else? We don't all get what we want at all times.
> compared to early adopters of Bitcoin
Vitalik was involved in Bitcoin as early as just about anyone else. His bitcointalk account predates mine— for example.