I hope this information, or the equivalent, filters into the awareness of judges. I was in traffic court in Virginia last year and, as I was waiting for my case, heard the judge explain to several defendants who were there to challenge their lidar tickets that the lidar was essentially infallible and could not be confused by other cars on the road. And this was an intelligent judge who seemed unusually sympathetic to the accused.
Unfortunately judges are people and if you have tons of people coming in with just "LIDAR is not accurate enough to prove reasonable doubt" compared to cops bringing in studies proving their accuracy it is difficult to listen to it.