Correct, I might have broken the title description rule, but I think my description more accurately summarizes what happened. I don't think my title is biased one way or the other.

Your title leaving out the "innocent" part makes it a stunningly inaccurate summary.

The article doesn't even mention Skyrim. To add that to the title plus the username itself but not the fact he was innocent is a wild choice.

I find it incredibly difficult to parse your title fwiw

Your title is unbiased by way of incomprehensibility.