Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The LGPL is a very different license, but glibc is not licensed under it, nor under the GPL.


It's got a number of different licenses for it's various components. LGPL 2.1 is among them.

License file at https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=LICEN...

Source at https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=summary


I appreciate the correction. It looks like specifically the long double libm functions (things like extended precision square root and logarithm) and the DES implementation from SSLeay are licensed under the LGPL? That seems to conflict with badgersnake's link https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/#license


Someone should update this then. Isn't glibc the poster child for LGPL? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glibc


That’s not what it says here: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/#license




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: