> I think it is important to understand that the technocratic egalitarianism advocated nowadays in Silicon Valley circles is a poor rehash of Marxist notions.
I don't think that's what they're proposing at all. And if you want me to believe it, you're going to have to do more than claim it's true.
What, specifically, do you see in either the idea of basic income or in "technocratic egalitarianism" that is inherently Marxist (as opposed to being merely superficially similar in some respects)?
I don't think that's what they're proposing at all. And if you want me to believe it, you're going to have to do more than claim it's true.
What, specifically, do you see in either the idea of basic income or in "technocratic egalitarianism" that is inherently Marxist (as opposed to being merely superficially similar in some respects)?